Search results

Article 21 paragraph (5) of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law states that the Chairperson of the Corruption Eradication Commission "works collectively", which in the explanation stated that each decision making must be approved and decided together. The main problem of this research is about the pre-trial case of Budi Gunawan which was determined by the suspect by the KPK in the arguments of the petitioner's petition stating that the suspect's determination was not carried out collectively because at that time there was a vacancy of one of the KPK Leaders. Therefore this study aims to examine and examine the decision-making process by the KPK Leaders as the application of Article 21 paragraph (5) of the KPK Law and also determine the scope of tasks that are collectively decided and agreed upon together. This study uses a normative juridical method. The research specifications used are descriptive analytical, using a statute-approach approach, conceptual approach and comparative approach. The results of the study can be summarized as follows: First, the collective decision-making process is carried out in the form of ordinary mechanisms, formal mechanisms and urgent mechanisms. With the decision making procedure carried out by deliberation to reach consensus and use the most votes (voting) as stated in Commission Regulation No. 3 of 2009 concerning the procedures for decision making by the KPK leadership, but in the provisions of Article 7 PK / 3/2009 formulate that decision making can be carried out in less than 3 (three) people (not fulfilling the quorum) in the event of an urgent situation, and meaning the collective "by the KPK is not always interpreted as making decisions in its entirety (the five leaders), then the provision overrides the actual collective meaning based on the principle of working collectively. Second, as for the scope of the collective decision-making tasks by the KPK Leaders regulated in Article 3 CHAPTER III LEADERSHIP Regulation No. 1 of 2015 concerning the Organization and Work Procedure of the KPK, it is stated that the increase in the status of suspects is the scope of tasks decided and agreed collectively with expose procedure. Keywords: komisi pemberatasan korupsi, pengambilan keputusan, keputusan kolektif

Act number 51 of 2009 concerning the second amandement to Act Number 5 Year 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court governing the implementation of Decision of State Administrative Court based on the awareness of State Business Officials/Officers with hierarchical stages of hierarchy as stipulated in Article 116 of Act Number 5 Year 1986, was not effective enough to fource the State Admnistrative Officers to carry out the Decision of the State Admnistrative Judge. This is evident form some decisions that are not implemented by the State Admnistratin Officer. Therefore, the amandement to Act Number 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court brought significant chages to this matter, namaely Article 116 paragraph (4) of Act Number 9 of 2004 and the second amandement of Act Number 51 Year 2009 states that "In the event that has obtained permanent legal force, the official concerned shall be subjected to a forced attempt in the form of payment of sum of forced and/or admnistrative sanctions. But in the curse of the implementation of the forced effort is also not fully implemented because it creates various obstacles. The purpose of this paper analyzes and examinis the implementation of forces efforts in the execution of state admnistrative court decisions to state admnistrative officials. The method used is normative juridical research specification used is descriptive analytical, that is trying to describe or describe the problems associated with the object of reasearch. The result of thi reasearch is the application of the forced effort is an additional punisment that is as "condemnatoir". It is intended that this additional punishment may fultill the implementation of the forced effort that imposes the admnistrative officer of the state to pay a sum of money and is subject to admnistrative senctions not yet fully enforceable because there is no further regulation concerning the payment of the amount of money, the amount, who is entitled to determine payment and/or admnistrative sanctions and payment mechanisms. Suggestions form the result of this study are to recommend to the Supreme Court to make operational guidelines or Juknis about further rules on forced efforts. Recommend to the state admnistrative bodies/official in issung state administrative decisions should be more careful and follow all decisions issued by the Admnistrative Court so that the dignity of the Institute can be maintained.Keywords : state administrative courts, forced effort, dwangsom

Indonesian independence is a new era in the formation of the constitution and order of state life. Because it was at this moment of independence that Indonesia first formed its written constitution in a standardized manner and compiled it into a state sheet. The constitution is called the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which has been amended four times to date. The points that become the discussion are regarding the provisions contained in Article 37 regarding the procedure for amending the 1945 Constitution whether it has applied the principles of constitutional democracy because the last amendment of the amendment to the 1945 Constitution from the provisions of Article 37 cannot be implemented anymore. The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze whether the provisions of Article 37 of the 1945 Constitution have applied the principles of constitutional democracy. The research methodology used is normative juridical with a descriptive analysis approach. Based on the results of the research on the amendment procedure of the 1945 Constitution, it adopts a method of change known as "verfassungs-anderung", namely a way of changing the constitution deliberately in the manner specified in the constitution. Then use a system of changes "constitutional reform". With the "formal juridical" pathway and completed as changes by means of "formal amendments", namely changes to the constitution which are made in accordance with the provisions contained in the constitution. So in other words Article 37 of the 1945 Constitution regarding the procedures for amending the 1945 Constitution has inspired the values of democratic principles procedurally but the substance of the provisions of Article 37 of the 1945 Constitution is not fully applied to the principles of constitutional democracy because there are still many provisions in Article 37 regarding the procedures for amending the 1945 Constitution. This still needs to be studied in depth, because of its flexible nature after the changes, but its content is still rigid and difficult to change. Keywords : constitutional, democracy, , constitutional amendment procedure

Politik uang (money politic) menjadi momok dan problem hukum tersendiri ketika konstelasi politik pemilu berlangsung terutama pemilu legislatif, dalam konteks ini pemilih tidak lagi melihat sosok calon legislatif yang pantas atau layak dipilih dengan pertimbangan aspek kompetensi dan kapasitas sebagai representasi rakyat di lembaga legislatif untuk lima tahun ke depan, namun lebih kepada berapa jumlah uang yang diberikan kepadanya. Pengaturan hukum terhadap pelarangan politik uang (money politic) diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu Pasal 523 ayat 1 dan 2. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Pasal 101 Badan Pengawas Pemilu diberikan kewenangan untuk melakukan pencegahan dan penindakan terkait dengan pelanggaran peraturan perundang-undangan Pemilu serta menyelesaikan sengketa proses Pemilu. Badan Pengawas Pemilu Kabupaten Aceh Barat belum melaksanakan tugas secara maksimal khusus dalam konteks penanggulangan pelanggaran politik uang (money politic) pada pemilu serentak 2019. Hal itu dapat dilihat dengan tidak adanya case yang ditanganinya. Penegakan supremasi hukum (law enforcement) salah satu cara penanggulangan tindak pidana termasuk masalah politik uang (money politic), karena pemidanaan pada prinsipnya bertujuan yaitu sebagai berikut: Sebagai sarana memberikan efek jera pada si pelaku; Memberikan pembelajaran pada orang lain agar tidak melakukan tindak pidana.

Law enforcement against tiger trafficking is a form of tiger protection carried out by the government. In upholding this law, it is necessary to have cooperation between law enforcement officers and the community so that it can minimize the crime of tiger trafficking and can be immediately followed up if someone commits a crime of tiger trafficking in Bener Meriah Regency. This research is an empirical legal reseach which is a reseach using a qualitative approach and descriptive reseach analysis. . As for the purpose of this study is to determine whether law enforcement against tiger trafficking in Bener Meriah Regency has been carried out properly in accordance with the prevailing laws. Law enforcement carried out by the Bener Meriah Regency government is in accordance with the applicable provisions, namely Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 5 of 1990 concerning Natural Resources Conservation and in accordance with the international convention cites (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora).

The existence of Indonesia as a form of unitary state has recognized and respected customary law community units and their traditional rights as long as they are still alive and in accordance with the development of society. One of them is regarding the specificity of customary institutions in the province that have certain and special powers such as the Tuha Peut Aceh institution and the West Sumatran Nagari Customary Council (KAN), this study will examine the similarities and differences in the authority of the two traditional institutions in the area. along with the position in the institutional structure of government in the village. This study aims to examine the position of Aceh's Tuha Peut Institution and West Sumatra's Nagari Adat Density Institution and to describe the differences and similarities in authority between the two institutions. The research method uses normative research or library research with a statutory approach and a comparative approach. The results of the study show that the authority for formulating village budgets, formulating village regulations, as well as supervision carried out by the two traditional institutions on the village government will have a positive impact on everyone, where any legal problems that can still be resolved in traditional institutions can still use traditional institutions. existing in an area.